🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 705+ reviews
Men βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage JAMS shorts

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.1 out of 5 (705 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$42
$70
Sale
βœ“ at no charge dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Jams80sShorts-JamsWaist- can go to 17 draw stringHip-22 1/2Length-16 1/2No flaws

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift dispatch
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage JAMS shorts

Jams
80s

Shorts-
Jams
Waist- can go to 17 draw string
Hip-22 1/2
Length-16 1/2
No flaws

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2149213

Category: Men > Shorts > Board, Surf

Original Price:$70 USD

Sale Price: $42 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6023 reviews
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Simply extraordinary
the Vintage JAMS shorts is practical which is good enough. Packaging was elementary.
45 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Sacramento, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
outstanding choice
After several use, it is practical which is good enough. Nothing fancy.
14 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase 
1 week ago Β· brand-new York, NY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly urge!
Packaging was fine.
17 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Las Vegas, NV
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So glad I bought this
From my experience, the Vintage JAMS shorts works well enough so it’s acceptable. fulfillment was normal.
50 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner
2 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
marvelous quality
I wouldn’t call it delightful, but the Vintage JAMS shorts is solid.
22 people found this helpful