🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 631+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Vintage charcuterie magnet

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.6 out of 5 (631 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$2.56​
$4.27
Sale
βœ“ at no charge dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage charcuterie magnet. From the 80s. Smoke on the house

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express delivery
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage charcuterie magnet

Vintage charcuterie magnet. From the 80s. Smoke gratis

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1017468

Category: Vintage > Houseware > Magnets

Original Price:$4.27 USD

Sale Price: $2.56 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2615 reviews
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
remarkable find!
It’s an okay product overall, the Vintage charcuterie magnet.
20 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
ultimate decision
Overall, the Vintage charcuterie magnet is fine for what it is.
22 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
flawless Vintage charcuterie magnet
After certain use, the Vintage charcuterie magnet works well enough and it’s fine overall.
24 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King
10 months ago Β· Atlanta, GA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A must-have
At first, it is effortless to use so it’s acceptable. shipment was normal.
5 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
incredibly pleased
Personally, the Vintage charcuterie magnet fits my needs and I’m satisfied. Packaging was straightforward.
14 people found this helpful