๐Ÿšš complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.2/5 from 233+ reviews
Home โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Shark steam mop

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.2 out of 5 (233 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$25
$41.67
Sale
โœ“ at no charge dispatch on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

newly-released in box (this one is a display. You will receive a new one) Retail $69.99Buy now $30

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
express shipment
โ†ฉ๏ธ
uncomplicated Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Shark steam mop

brand-new in box (this one is a display. You will receive a new one)
Retail $69.99
acquire immediately $30

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Home products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 482536

Category: Home > Cleaning Supplies > Sweeping

Original Price:$41.67 USD

Sale Price: $25 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand simply-arrived

๐Ÿšš transport & Returns

โœ“ no-cost fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days​

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.2
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 4346 reviews
HP
Heather Perez
9 months ago ยท Colorado Springs, CO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Outstanding quality
After a few days, it feels okay so no complaints.
38 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago ยท Seattle, WA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
impeccable in every way
So far, the Shark steam mop feels solid which is good enough.
16 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Seattle, WA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Absolutely ideal
Good finish and build quality Shark steam mop.
49 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall
7 months ago ยท Oakland, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Exceptional quality
At first, the Shark steam mop performs as expected and it works for me. Arrived on time.
22 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Philadelphia, PA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
faultless Shark steam mop
Nothing negative to say about the Shark steam mop.
12 people found this helpful